Equatorial Guinea vs Paraguay: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Equatorial Guinea
52.08
in 2014
Paraguay
52.08
in 2014
Equatorial Guinea rank
149th
Paraguay rank
149th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Paraguay
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 52.08 against 52.08 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 149th and Paraguay ranks 149th of 181 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 51.25 | 38.33 | 12.92 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 52.08 | 45.83 | 6.25 | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Equatorial Guinea or Paraguay?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 52.08 against 52.08 in Paraguay as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Equatorial Guinea and Paraguay?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Paraguay?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Paraguay rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 149th and Paraguay ranks 149th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.