Dominican Republic vs Luxembourg: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Dominican Republic
95.83
in 2014
Luxembourg
95.83
in 2014
Dominican Republic rank
9th
Luxembourg rank
9th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Dominican Republic
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 95.83 against 95.83 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Dominican Republic ranks 9th and Luxembourg ranks 9th of 183 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.02 | 95.83 | 7.81 | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 95.42 | 95.83 | 0.4167 | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Dominican Republic or Luxembourg?
- Dominican Republic, at 95.83 against 95.83 in Luxembourg as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Dominican Republic and Luxembourg?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Luxembourg?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Dominican Republic and Luxembourg rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Dominican Republic ranks 9th and Luxembourg ranks 9th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.