Dominica vs Romania: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Dominica
85.42
in 2014
Romania
85.42
in 2014
Dominica rank
51st
Romania rank
51st
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Dominica
- Romania
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 85.42 against 85.42 in Romania, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Dominica ahead.
Dominica ranks 51st and Romania ranks 51st of 181 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.67 | 79.17 | 2.5 | Dominica |
| 2010s | 85.42 | 85.42 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Dominica or Romania?
- Dominica, at 85.42 against 85.42 in Romania as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Dominica and Romania?
- 0, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Romania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Dominica and Romania rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Dominica ranks 51st and Romania ranks 51st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.