Dominica vs Mexico: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Dominica
85.42
in 2014
Mexico
87.46
in 2014
Dominica rank
51st
Mexico rank
50th

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Dominica
  • Mexico
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 87.46 against 85.42 in Dominica, a difference of 2.04.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Dominica ranks 51st and Mexico ranks 50th of 181 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominica Mexico Difference Ahead
2000s 81.67 85.42 3.75 Mexico
2010s 85.42 87.48 2.07 Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Dominica or Mexico?
Mexico, at 87.46 against 85.42 in Dominica as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Dominica and Mexico?
2.04, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Mexico?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Dominica and Mexico rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Dominica ranks 51st and Mexico ranks 50th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.