Czechia vs Indonesia: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Czechia
77.08
in 2014
Indonesia
77.08
in 2014
Czechia rank
84th
Indonesia rank
84th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Czechia
- Indonesia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 77.08 against 77.08 in Indonesia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 84th and Indonesia ranks 84th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Indonesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.25 | 71.67 | 4.58 | Czechia |
| 2010s | 76.25 | 77.08 | 0.8333 | Indonesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Czechia or Indonesia?
- Czechia, at 77.08 against 77.08 in Indonesia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Czechia and Indonesia?
- 0, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Indonesia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Czechia and Indonesia rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Czechia ranks 84th and Indonesia ranks 84th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.