Czechia vs Eswatini: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Czechia
77.08
in 2014
Eswatini
77.08
in 2014
Czechia rank
84th
Eswatini rank
84th

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Czechia
  • Eswatini
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 77.08 against 77.08 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Czechia ahead.

Czechia ranks 84th and Eswatini ranks 84th of 181 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Eswatini Difference Ahead
2000s 76.25 68.75 7.5 Czechia
2010s 76.25 75.83 0.4167 Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Czechia or Eswatini?
Czechia, at 77.08 against 77.08 in Eswatini as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Czechia and Eswatini?
0, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Eswatini?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Czechia and Eswatini rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Czechia ranks 84th and Eswatini ranks 84th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.