Cyprus vs Netherlands: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Cyprus
97.92
in 2014
Netherlands
97.92
in 2014
Cyprus rank
6th
Netherlands rank
6th

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Cyprus
  • Netherlands
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 97.92 against 97.92 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.

Cyprus ranks 6th and Netherlands ranks 6th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Netherlands Difference Ahead
2000s 97.92 97.92 0
2010s 97.92 97.92 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Cyprus or Netherlands?
Cyprus, at 97.92 against 97.92 in Netherlands as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Cyprus and Netherlands?
0, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Netherlands?
7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2014.
How do Cyprus and Netherlands rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Cyprus ranks 6th and Netherlands ranks 6th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.