Cyprus vs South Korea: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Cyprus
97.92
in 2014
South Korea
95.83
in 2014
Cyprus rank
6th
South Korea rank
9th

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Cyprus
  • South Korea
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Cyprus currently reports 97.92 against 95.83 in South Korea, a difference of 2.09.

Across all 7 years both countries report, Cyprus has been ahead every year.

Cyprus ranks 6th and South Korea ranks 9th of 181 countries.

Cyprus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus South Korea Difference Ahead
2000s 97.92 93.75 4.17 Cyprus
2010s 97.92 95.42 2.5 Cyprus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Cyprus or South Korea?
Cyprus, at 97.92 against 95.83 in South Korea as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Cyprus and South Korea?
2.09, with Cyprus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and South Korea?
7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2014.
How do Cyprus and South Korea rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Cyprus ranks 6th and South Korea ranks 9th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.