Croatia vs Sri Lanka: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Croatia
79.17
in 2014
Sri Lanka
79.17
in 2014
Croatia rank
74th
Sri Lanka rank
74th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Croatia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 79.17 against 79.17 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Croatia ranks 74th and Sri Lanka ranks 74th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 65 | 65.42 | 0.4167 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 73.33 | 71.67 | 1.67 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Croatia or Sri Lanka?
- Croatia, at 79.17 against 79.17 in Sri Lanka as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Croatia and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Sri Lanka?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Croatia and Sri Lanka rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Croatia ranks 74th and Sri Lanka ranks 74th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.