Côte d'Ivoire vs Guinea-Bissau: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Côte d'Ivoire
60.42
in 2014
Guinea-Bissau
60.42
in 2014
Côte d'Ivoire rank
135th
Guinea-Bissau rank
135th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 60.42 against 60.42 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 135th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 135th of 183 countries.
Côte d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.75 | 57.08 | 6.67 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2010s | 60.42 | 60.42 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Côte d'Ivoire or Guinea-Bissau?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 60.42 against 60.42 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Côte d'Ivoire and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Guinea-Bissau?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 135th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 135th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.