Costa Rica vs Saint Lucia: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Costa Rica
83.33
in 2014
Saint Lucia
83.33
in 2014
Costa Rica rank
58th
Saint Lucia rank
58th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Costa Rica
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 83.33 against 83.33 in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Saint Lucia ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 58th and Saint Lucia ranks 58th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.67 | 73.33 | 11.67 | Saint Lucia |
| 2010s | 83.33 | 81.67 | 1.67 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Costa Rica or Saint Lucia?
- Costa Rica, at 83.33 against 83.33 in Saint Lucia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Costa Rica and Saint Lucia?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Saint Lucia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Costa Rica and Saint Lucia rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Costa Rica ranks 58th and Saint Lucia ranks 58th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.