Democratic Republic of Congo vs Nepal: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 29.17 against 20.83 in Democratic Republic of Congo, a difference of 8.34.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.4 times Democratic Republic of Congo's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 165th and Nepal ranks 162nd of 181 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 17.5 | 24.58 | 7.08 | Nepal |
| 2010s | 20.83 | 27.08 | 6.25 | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Democratic Republic of Congo or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 29.17 against 20.83 in Democratic Republic of Congo as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Democratic Republic of Congo and Nepal?
- 8.34, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Nepal?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Nepal rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 165th and Nepal ranks 162nd of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.