Comoros vs Micronesia (country): Trading across borders: Time to export (days) … days DB06-15 export
Comoros
47.92
in 2014
Micronesia (country)
50
in 2014
Comoros rank
157th
Micronesia (country) rank
156th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) … days DB06-15 export over time
- Comoros
- Micronesia (country)
How they compare
Micronesia (country) currently reports 50 against 47.92 in Comoros, a difference of 2.08.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Micronesia (country) has been ahead every year.
Comoros ranks 157th and Micronesia (country) ranks 156th of 184 countries.
Micronesia (country) has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Micronesia (country) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.92 | 50 | 2.08 | Micronesia (country) |
| 2010s | 47.92 | 50 | 2.08 | Micronesia (country) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Comoros or Micronesia (country)?
- Micronesia (country), at 50 against 47.92 in Comoros as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Comoros and Micronesia (country)?
- 2.08, with Micronesia (country) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Micronesia (country)?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Comoros and Micronesia (country) rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Comoros ranks 157th and Micronesia (country) ranks 156th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.