Chad vs Kazakhstan: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Chad
0
in 2014
Kazakhstan
0
in 2014
Chad rank
173rd
Kazakhstan rank
173rd

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Chad
  • Kazakhstan
00.20.40.60.81200520092014

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0 against 0 in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Kazakhstan has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 173rd and Kazakhstan ranks 173rd of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
2000s 0 0 0
2010s 0 0 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Chad or Kazakhstan?
Chad, at 0 against 0 in Kazakhstan as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Chad and Kazakhstan?
0, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Kazakhstan?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Chad and Kazakhstan rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Chad ranks 173rd and Kazakhstan ranks 173rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.