Canada vs Netherlands: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Canada
95.83
in 2014
Netherlands
97.92
in 2014
Canada rank
9th
Netherlands rank
6th

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Canada
  • Netherlands
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 97.92 against 95.83 in Canada, a difference of 2.09.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 9th and Netherlands ranks 6th of 181 countries.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Netherlands Difference Ahead
2000s 95.83 97.92 2.08 Netherlands
2010s 95.83 97.92 2.08 Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Canada or Netherlands?
Netherlands, at 97.92 against 95.83 in Canada as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Canada and Netherlands?
2.09, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Netherlands?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Canada and Netherlands rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Canada ranks 9th and Netherlands ranks 6th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.