Cambodia vs Lebanon: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Cambodia
66.67
in 2014
Lebanon
66.67
in 2014
Cambodia rank
117th
Lebanon rank
117th

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Cambodia
  • Lebanon
203040506070200520092014

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 66.67 against 66.67 in Lebanon, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Lebanon ahead.

Cambodia ranks 117th and Lebanon ranks 117th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Lebanon in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Lebanon Difference Ahead
2000s 45.42 59.58 14.17 Lebanon
2010s 66.67 65.42 1.25 Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Cambodia or Lebanon?
Cambodia, at 66.67 against 66.67 in Lebanon as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Cambodia and Lebanon?
0, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Lebanon?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Cambodia and Lebanon rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Cambodia ranks 117th and Lebanon ranks 117th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.