Burkina Faso vs Ethiopia: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Burkina Faso
27.08
in 2014
Ethiopia
20.83
in 2014
Burkina Faso rank
167th
Ethiopia rank
168th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Burkina Faso
- Ethiopia
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 27.08 against 20.83 in Ethiopia, a difference of 6.25.
That makes Burkina Faso's figure about 1.3 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Burkina Faso has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 167th and Ethiopia ranks 168th of 184 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Ethiopia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.42 | 13.33 | 7.08 | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 27.08 | 20.42 | 6.67 | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Burkina Faso or Ethiopia?
- Burkina Faso, at 27.08 against 20.83 in Ethiopia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Burkina Faso and Ethiopia?
- 6.25, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Ethiopia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Burkina Faso and Ethiopia rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Burkina Faso ranks 167th and Ethiopia ranks 168th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.