Brunei vs Guyana: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Brunei
72.92
in 2014
Guyana
72.92
in 2014
Brunei rank
95th
Guyana rank
95th

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Brunei
  • Guyana
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Brunei currently reports 72.92 against 72.92 in Guyana, a difference of 0.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.

Brunei ranks 95th and Guyana ranks 95th of 181 countries.

Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brunei Guyana Difference Ahead
2000s 56.25 69.27 13.02 Guyana
2010s 70.42 72.92 2.5 Guyana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Brunei or Guyana?
Brunei, at 72.92 against 72.92 in Guyana as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Brunei and Guyana?
0, with Brunei ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei and Guyana?
9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
How do Brunei and Guyana rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Brunei ranks 95th and Guyana ranks 95th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.