Brazil vs Montenegro: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Brazil
84.6
in 2014
Montenegro
83.33
in 2014
Brazil rank
57th
Montenegro rank
58th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Brazil
- Montenegro
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 84.6 against 83.33 in Montenegro, a difference of 1.27.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Brazil ranks 57th and Montenegro ranks 58th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.21 | 83.33 | 3.12 | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 85.09 | 83.33 | 1.76 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Brazil or Montenegro?
- Brazil, at 84.6 against 83.33 in Montenegro as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Brazil and Montenegro?
- 1.27, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Montenegro?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2014.
- How do Brazil and Montenegro rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Brazil ranks 57th and Montenegro ranks 58th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.