Brazil vs Costa Rica: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Brazil
84.6
in 2014
Costa Rica
83.33
in 2014
Brazil rank
57th
Costa Rica rank
58th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Brazil
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 84.6 against 83.33 in Costa Rica, a difference of 1.27.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 57th and Costa Rica ranks 58th of 183 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.17 | 61.67 | 17.5 | Brazil |
| 2010s | 85.09 | 83.33 | 1.76 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Brazil or Costa Rica?
- Brazil, at 84.6 against 83.33 in Costa Rica as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Brazil and Costa Rica?
- 1.27, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Costa Rica?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Brazil and Costa Rica rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Brazil ranks 57th and Costa Rica ranks 58th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.