Botswana vs Haiti: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Botswana
56.25
in 2014
Haiti
54.17
in 2014
Botswana rank
143rd
Haiti rank
145th

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Botswana
  • Haiti
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 56.25 against 54.17 in Haiti, a difference of 2.08.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.

Botswana ranks 143rd and Haiti ranks 145th of 181 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Haiti Difference Ahead
2000s 45.83 25 20.83 Botswana
2010s 55.42 45 10.42 Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Botswana or Haiti?
Botswana, at 56.25 against 54.17 in Haiti as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Botswana and Haiti?
2.08, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Haiti?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Botswana and Haiti rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Botswana ranks 143rd and Haiti ranks 145th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.