Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Croatia: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Bosnia and Herzegovina
79.17
in 2014
Croatia
79.17
in 2014
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
76th
Croatia rank
76th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Croatia
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 79.17 against 79.17 in Croatia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 76th and Croatia ranks 76th of 184 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.83 | 65 | 5.83 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 78.75 | 73.33 | 5.42 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Bosnia and Herzegovina or Croatia?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 79.17 against 79.17 in Croatia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia?
- 0, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Croatia rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 76th and Croatia ranks 76th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.