Benin vs Namibia: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Benin
60.42
in 2014
Namibia
62.5
in 2014
Benin rank
133rd
Namibia rank
131st

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Benin
  • Namibia
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 62.5 against 60.42 in Benin, a difference of 2.08.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Namibia has been ahead every year.

Benin ranks 133rd and Namibia ranks 131st of 181 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Benin Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 44.17 62.5 18.33 Namibia
2010s 54.17 62.5 8.33 Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Benin or Namibia?
Namibia, at 62.5 against 60.42 in Benin as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Benin and Namibia?
2.08, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Namibia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Benin and Namibia rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Benin ranks 133rd and Namibia ranks 131st of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.