Bangladesh vs Equatorial Guinea: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Bangladesh
53.46
in 2014
Equatorial Guinea
52.08
in 2014
Bangladesh rank
148th
Equatorial Guinea rank
149th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Bangladesh
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 53.46 against 52.08 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 1.38.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Bangladesh ranks 148th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 149th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.25 | 51.25 | 10 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 52.54 | 52.08 | 0.4583 | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Bangladesh or Equatorial Guinea?
- Bangladesh, at 53.46 against 52.08 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Bangladesh and Equatorial Guinea?
- 1.38, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Equatorial Guinea?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Bangladesh and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Bangladesh ranks 148th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 149th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.