Bahrain vs Malaysia: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Bahrain
89.58
in 2014
Malaysia
89.58
in 2014
Bahrain rank
37th
Malaysia rank
37th

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Bahrain
  • Malaysia
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Bahrain currently reports 89.58 against 89.58 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Malaysia ahead.

Bahrain ranks 37th and Malaysia ranks 37th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Bahrain averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahrain Malaysia Difference Ahead
2000s 83.33 85.42 2.08 Malaysia
2010s 89.58 87.92 1.67 Bahrain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Bahrain or Malaysia?
Bahrain, at 89.58 against 89.58 in Malaysia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Bahrain and Malaysia?
0, with Bahrain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Malaysia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
How do Bahrain and Malaysia rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Bahrain ranks 37th and Malaysia ranks 37th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.