Bahrain vs Japan: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Bahrain
89.58
in 2014
Japan
89.58
in 2014
Bahrain rank
37th
Japan rank
37th

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Bahrain
  • Japan
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Bahrain currently reports 89.58 against 89.58 in Japan, a difference of 0.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Bahrain ranks 37th and Japan ranks 37th of 181 countries.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahrain Japan Difference Ahead
2000s 83.33 89.58 6.25 Japan
2010s 89.58 89.58 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Bahrain or Japan?
Bahrain, at 89.58 against 89.58 in Japan as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Bahrain and Japan?
0, with Bahrain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Japan?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
How do Bahrain and Japan rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Bahrain ranks 37th and Japan ranks 37th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.