Bahamas vs Fiji: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Bahamas
72.92
in 2014
Fiji
72.92
in 2014
Bahamas rank
95th
Fiji rank
95th

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Bahamas
  • Fiji
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 72.92 against 72.92 in Fiji, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 95th and Fiji ranks 95th of 181 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Fiji Difference Ahead
2000s 79.17 68.75 10.42 Bahamas
2010s 72.92 72.92 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Bahamas or Fiji?
Bahamas, at 72.92 against 72.92 in Fiji as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Bahamas and Fiji?
0, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Fiji?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
How do Bahamas and Fiji rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Bahamas ranks 95th and Fiji ranks 95th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.