Bahamas, The vs Brunei Darussalam: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Bahamas, The
72.92
in 2014
Brunei Darussalam
72.92
in 2014
Bahamas, The rank
96th
Brunei Darussalam rank
96th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Bahamas, The
- Brunei Darussalam
How they compare
Bahamas, The currently reports 72.92 against 72.92 in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Bahamas, The ahead.
Bahamas, The ranks 96th and Brunei Darussalam ranks 96th of 183 countries.
Bahamas, The has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas, The | Brunei Darussalam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.17 | 56.25 | 22.92 | Bahamas, The |
| 2010s | 72.92 | 70.42 | 2.5 | Bahamas, The |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Bahamas, The or Brunei Darussalam?
- Bahamas, The, at 72.92 against 72.92 in Brunei Darussalam as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Bahamas, The and Brunei Darussalam?
- 0, with Bahamas, The ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas, The and Brunei Darussalam?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2014.
- How do Bahamas, The and Brunei Darussalam rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Bahamas, The ranks 96th and Brunei Darussalam ranks 96th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.