Azerbaijan vs East Timor: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Azerbaijan
56.25
in 2014
East Timor
54.17
in 2014
Azerbaijan rank
143rd
East Timor rank
145th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Azerbaijan
- East Timor
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 56.25 against 54.17 in East Timor, a difference of 2.08.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was East Timor ahead.
Azerbaijan ranks 143rd and East Timor ranks 145th of 181 countries.
East Timor has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.5 | 54.17 | 11.67 | East Timor |
| 2010s | 53.33 | 54.17 | 0.8334 | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Azerbaijan or East Timor?
- Azerbaijan, at 56.25 against 54.17 in East Timor as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Azerbaijan and East Timor?
- 2.08, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and East Timor?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Azerbaijan and East Timor rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Azerbaijan ranks 143rd and East Timor ranks 145th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.