Azerbaijan vs Botswana: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Azerbaijan
56.25
in 2014
Botswana
56.25
in 2014
Azerbaijan rank
143rd
Botswana rank
143rd

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Botswana
0204060200520092014

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 56.25 against 56.25 in Botswana, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.

Azerbaijan ranks 143rd and Botswana ranks 143rd of 181 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Botswana Difference Ahead
2000s 42.5 45.83 3.33 Botswana
2010s 53.33 55.42 2.08 Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Azerbaijan or Botswana?
Azerbaijan, at 56.25 against 56.25 in Botswana as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Azerbaijan and Botswana?
0, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Botswana?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Azerbaijan and Botswana rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Azerbaijan ranks 143rd and Botswana ranks 143rd of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.