Australia vs Finland: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Australia
93.75
in 2014
Finland
93.75
in 2014
Australia rank
17th
Finland rank
17th

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Australia
  • Finland
020406080100200520092014

How they compare

Australia currently reports 93.75 against 93.75 in Finland, a difference of 0.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 17th and Finland ranks 17th of 181 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Finland Difference Ahead
2000s 93.75 93.75 0
2010s 93.75 93.75 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Australia or Finland?
Australia, at 93.75 against 93.75 in Finland as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Australia and Finland?
0, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Finland?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Australia and Finland rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Australia ranks 17th and Finland ranks 17th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.