Armenia vs Croatia: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Armenia
79.17
in 2014
Croatia
79.17
in 2014
Armenia rank
74th
Croatia rank
74th

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Armenia
  • Croatia
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Armenia currently reports 79.17 against 79.17 in Croatia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Croatia ahead.

Armenia ranks 74th and Croatia ranks 74th of 181 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Croatia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Croatia Difference Ahead
2000s 45.83 65 19.17 Croatia
2010s 79.17 73.33 5.83 Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Armenia or Croatia?
Armenia, at 79.17 against 79.17 in Croatia as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Armenia and Croatia?
0, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Croatia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Armenia and Croatia rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Armenia ranks 74th and Croatia ranks 74th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.