Armenia vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Armenia
79.17
in 2014
Bosnia and Herzegovina
79.17
in 2014
Armenia rank
76th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
76th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Armenia
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 79.17 against 79.17 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Armenia ranks 76th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 76th of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Bosnia and Herzegovina in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.83 | 70.83 | 25 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | 79.17 | 78.75 | 0.4167 | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Armenia or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- Armenia, at 79.17 against 79.17 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Armenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 0, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Armenia and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Armenia ranks 76th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 76th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.