Antigua and Barbuda vs Seychelles: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Antigua and Barbuda
79.17
in 2014
Seychelles
79.17
in 2014
Antigua and Barbuda rank
74th
Seychelles rank
74th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Seychelles
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 79.17 against 79.17 in Seychelles, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 74th and Seychelles ranks 74th of 181 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.25 | 77.08 | 4.17 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 79.58 | 78.75 | 0.8333 | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Antigua and Barbuda or Seychelles?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 79.17 against 79.17 in Seychelles as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Antigua and Barbuda and Seychelles?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Seychelles?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Seychelles rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 74th and Seychelles ranks 74th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.