Antigua and Barbuda vs Croatia: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Antigua and Barbuda
79.17
in 2014
Croatia
79.17
in 2014
Antigua and Barbuda rank
75th
Croatia rank
75th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- Croatia
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 79.17 against 79.17 in Croatia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 75th and Croatia ranks 75th of 183 countries.
Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.25 | 65 | 16.25 | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 79.58 | 73.33 | 6.25 | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Antigua and Barbuda or Croatia?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 79.17 against 79.17 in Croatia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Antigua and Barbuda and Croatia?
- 0, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Croatia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and Croatia rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 75th and Croatia ranks 75th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.