Angola vs Guinea: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Angola
29.17
in 2014
Guinea
37.5
in 2014
Angola rank
162nd
Guinea rank
160th

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Angola
  • Guinea
010203040200520092014

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 37.5 against 29.17 in Angola, a difference of 8.33.

That makes Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Angola's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.

Angola ranks 162nd and Guinea ranks 160th of 181 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 0 41.67 41.67 Guinea
2010s 17.5 37.5 20 Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Angola or Guinea?
Guinea, at 37.5 against 29.17 in Angola as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Angola and Guinea?
8.33, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Guinea?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Angola and Guinea rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Angola ranks 162nd and Guinea ranks 160th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.