Angola vs Burkina Faso: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Angola
29.17
in 2014
Burkina Faso
27.08
in 2014
Angola rank
164th
Burkina Faso rank
166th
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Angola
- Burkina Faso
How they compare
Angola currently reports 29.17 against 27.08 in Burkina Faso, a difference of 2.09.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Burkina Faso's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Angola ranks 164th and Burkina Faso ranks 166th of 183 countries.
Burkina Faso has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Burkina Faso | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 20.42 | 20.42 | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 17.5 | 27.08 | 9.58 | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Angola or Burkina Faso?
- Angola, at 29.17 against 27.08 in Burkina Faso as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Angola and Burkina Faso?
- 2.09, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Burkina Faso?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Angola and Burkina Faso rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Angola ranks 164th and Burkina Faso ranks 166th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.