Albania vs Ecuador: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)

Albania
72.92
in 2014
Ecuador
72.92
in 2014
Albania rank
95th
Ecuador rank
95th

Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time

  • Albania
  • Ecuador
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Albania currently reports 72.92 against 72.92 in Ecuador, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Albania ahead.

Albania ranks 95th and Ecuador ranks 95th of 181 countries.

Albania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Ecuador Difference Ahead
2000s 69.58 68.33 1.25 Albania
2010s 72.92 71.25 1.67 Albania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Albania or Ecuador?
Albania, at 72.92 against 72.92 in Ecuador as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Albania and Ecuador?
0, with Albania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Ecuador?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Albania and Ecuador rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
Albania ranks 95th and Ecuador ranks 95th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.