Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of vs Zambia: Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology)
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
0
in 2014
Zambia
6.25
in 2014
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of rank
175th
Zambia rank
173rd
Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) over time
- Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 6.25 against 0 in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of, a difference of 6.25.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 175th and Zambia ranks 173rd of 183 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 | 2.08 | 2.08 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 0 | 6.25 | 6.25 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology), Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 6.25 against 0 in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology) between Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Zambia?
- 6.25, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Zambia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of and Zambia rank globally for trading across borders: time to export (days) (db06-15 methodology)?
- Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 175th and Zambia ranks 173rd of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export (days) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.