Saint Vincent and the Grenadines vs Uzbekistan: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours)
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
83.02
in 2019
Uzbekistan
80.64
in 2019
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank
77th
Uzbekistan rank
79th
Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines currently reports 83.02 against 80.64 in Uzbekistan, a difference of 2.38.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has been ahead every year.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 77th and Uzbekistan ranks 79th of 191 countries.
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours), Saint Vincent and the Grenadines or Uzbekistan?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, at 83.02 against 80.64 in Uzbekistan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) between Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Uzbekistan?
- 2.38, with Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Uzbekistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Saint Vincent and the Grenadines and Uzbekistan rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours)?
- Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 77th and Uzbekistan ranks 79th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.