Micronesia (Federated States of) vs Uzbekistan: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours)
Micronesia (Federated States of)
77.99
in 2019
Uzbekistan
80.64
in 2019
Micronesia (Federated States of) rank
80th
Uzbekistan rank
78th
Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Micronesia (Federated States of)
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 80.64 against 77.99 in Micronesia (Federated States of), a difference of 2.65.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Micronesia (Federated States of) ahead.
Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 80th and Uzbekistan ranks 78th of 190 countries.
Micronesia (Federated States of) has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours), Micronesia (Federated States of) or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 80.64 against 77.99 in Micronesia (Federated States of) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) between Micronesia (Federated States of) and Uzbekistan?
- 2.65, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (Federated States of) and Uzbekistan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Micronesia (Federated States of) and Uzbekistan rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours)?
- Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 80th and Uzbekistan ranks 78th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.