Malaysia vs Oman: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1

Malaysia
83.02
in 2019
Oman
83.33
in 2019
Malaysia rank
75th
Oman rank
73rd

Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 over time

  • Malaysia
  • Oman
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Oman currently reports 83.33 against 83.02 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.31.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 75th and Oman ranks 73rd of 188 countries.

Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1, Malaysia or Oman?
Oman, at 83.33 against 83.02 in Malaysia as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 between Malaysia and Oman?
0.31, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Oman?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Malaysia and Oman rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1?
Malaysia ranks 75th and Oman ranks 73rd of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.