Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Singapore: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours)
Lao People's Democratic Republic
94.97
in 2019
Singapore
94.34
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
43rd
Singapore rank
46th
Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Singapore
How they compare
Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 94.97 against 94.34 in Singapore, a difference of 0.63.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Singapore ahead.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 43rd and Singapore ranks 46th of 190 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours), Lao People's Democratic Republic or Singapore?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 94.97 against 94.34 in Singapore as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Singapore?
- 0.63, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Singapore?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Singapore rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours)?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 43rd and Singapore ranks 46th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.