Lao People's Democratic Republic vs North Macedonia: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours)
Lao People's Democratic Republic
94.97
in 2019
North Macedonia
95.28
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
43rd
North Macedonia rank
42nd
Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 95.28 against 94.97 in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.31.
Across all 6 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 43rd and North Macedonia ranks 42nd of 190 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours), Lao People's Democratic Republic or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 95.28 against 94.97 in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) between Lao People's Democratic Republic and North Macedonia?
- 0.31, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and North Macedonia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and North Macedonia rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours)?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 43rd and North Macedonia ranks 42nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.