Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Montenegro: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours)
Lao People's Democratic Republic
94.97
in 2019
Montenegro
95.85
in 2019
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
43rd
Montenegro rank
41st
Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Lao People's Democratic Republic
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 95.85 against 94.97 in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.88.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 43rd and Montenegro ranks 41st of 190 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours), Lao People's Democratic Republic or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 95.85 against 94.97 in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Montenegro?
- 0.88, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Montenegro?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Montenegro rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours)?
- Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 43rd and Montenegro ranks 41st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.