South Korea vs Nepal: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1

South Korea
92.22
in 2019
Nepal
93.71
in 2019
South Korea rank
49th
Nepal rank
46th

Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 over time

  • South Korea
  • Nepal
020406080100201420162019

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 93.71 against 92.22 in South Korea, a difference of 1.49.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Korea ahead.

South Korea ranks 49th and Nepal ranks 46th of 188 countries.

South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1, South Korea or Nepal?
Nepal, at 93.71 against 92.22 in South Korea as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 between South Korea and Nepal?
1.49, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Nepal?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do South Korea and Nepal rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1?
South Korea ranks 49th and Nepal ranks 46th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.