Kenya vs South Korea: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1

Kenya
90.88
in 2019
South Korea
92.22
in 2019
Kenya rank
50th
South Korea rank
49th

Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 over time

  • Kenya
  • South Korea
020406080100201420162019

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 92.22 against 90.88 in Kenya, a difference of 1.34.

Across all 6 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.

Kenya ranks 50th and South Korea ranks 49th of 188 countries.

South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1, Kenya or South Korea?
South Korea, at 92.22 against 90.88 in Kenya as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 between Kenya and South Korea?
1.34, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and South Korea?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Kenya and South Korea rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1?
Kenya ranks 50th and South Korea ranks 49th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.