Honduras vs Palau: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1

Honduras
32.7
in 2019
Palau
36.66
in 2019
Honduras rank
162nd
Palau rank
159th

Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 over time

  • Honduras
  • Palau
010203040201420162019

How they compare

Palau currently reports 36.66 against 32.7 in Honduras, a difference of 3.96.

That makes Palau's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Palau has been ahead every year.

Honduras ranks 162nd and Palau ranks 159th of 188 countries.

Palau has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1, Honduras or Palau?
Palau, at 36.66 against 32.7 in Honduras as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 between Honduras and Palau?
3.96, with Palau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Palau?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Honduras and Palau rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1?
Honduras ranks 162nd and Palau ranks 159th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.