Guinea-Bissau vs Namibia: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1

Guinea-Bissau
26.42
in 2019
Namibia
25.16
in 2019
Guinea-Bissau rank
168th
Namibia rank
169th

Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB1 over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Namibia
0102030201420162019

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 26.42 against 25.16 in Namibia, a difference of 1.26.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 168th and Namibia ranks 169th of 188 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1, Guinea-Bissau or Namibia?
Guinea-Bissau, at 26.42 against 25.16 in Namibia as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1 between Guinea-Bissau and Namibia?
1.26, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Namibia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Namibia rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) (db1?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 168th and Namibia ranks 169th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.