Eswatini, Kingdom of vs Serbia, Republic of: Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours)
Eswatini, Kingdom of
99.3
in 2019
Serbia, Republic of
98.03
in 2019
Eswatini, Kingdom of rank
25th
Serbia, Republic of rank
29th
Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) over time
- Eswatini, Kingdom of
- Serbia, Republic of
How they compare
Eswatini, Kingdom of currently reports 99.3 against 98.03 in Serbia, Republic of, a difference of 1.27.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Eswatini, Kingdom of has been ahead every year.
Eswatini, Kingdom of ranks 25th and Serbia, Republic of ranks 29th of 190 countries.
Eswatini, Kingdom of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours), Eswatini, Kingdom of or Serbia, Republic of?
- Eswatini, Kingdom of, at 99.3 against 98.03 in Serbia, Republic of as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours) between Eswatini, Kingdom of and Serbia, Republic of?
- 1.27, with Eswatini, Kingdom of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini, Kingdom of and Serbia, Republic of?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Eswatini, Kingdom of and Serbia, Republic of rank globally for trading across borders: time to export: border compliance (hours)?
- Eswatini, Kingdom of ranks 25th and Serbia, Republic of ranks 29th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Time to export: Border compliance (hours) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the time for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.